Mortality in relation to season, age, sex, and reproduction in Columbian ground squirrels (<i>Spermophilus columbianus</i>)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We investigated the timing of and age at mortality in Columbian ground squirrels (Spermophilus columbianus) in relation to sex and reproductive status. Life-history data were collected from 1994 to 1999 in the foothills of the Rocky Mountains, Alberta, Canada. We predicted increased mortality for males during mating and for females during lactation. Further, we expected reproductively successful females to have higher mortality than females that did not reproduce successfully. Finally we assumed that at some age reproductive success of females would decrease and mortality increase because of old age. For both sexes, survival over winter was high (ca. 90%) for adults. While there was a significant increase in mortality of adult males during the mating season, females did not have higher mortality during lactation than during the rest of the active season. Reproductive status influenced mortality in females: non-reproducing females had a higher chance of surviving than reproducing females. Females that weaned young were more likely to die after the weaning period than females that lost their litter during lactation. There was a positive correlation between maternal survival and survival of offspring to yearling age. Our results showed evidence of trade-offs between reproduction and survival of male and female Columbian ground squirrels.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".