Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No AccessPerspectives on Augmentative and Alternative CommunicationArticle1 Jun 2004Using Internet Resources Within and Beyond the Classroom Patricia Dowden Patricia Dowden University of Washington, Seattle Google Scholar More articles by this author https://doi.org/10.1044/aac13.2.17 SectionsAboutFull TextPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationTrack Citations ShareFacebookTwitterLinked In References Dowden, P., & Amtmann, D. (1996, August) Distance learning & AAC. Seminar at the 7th Biennial Conference of the International Society for Augmentative and Alternative Communication. Vancouver, BC, Canada. Google Scholar Lasker, J., & Dowden, P. (2003, November). Graduate courses in AAC: What and how are we teaching?. Poster session presented at the annual ASHA Convention. Chicago. Google Scholar Additional Resources FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 13Issue 2June 2004Pages: 17-20 Get Permissions Add to your Mendeley library History Published in issue: Jun 1, 2004 Metrics Topicsasha-topicsleader-topicsasha-article-typesasha-sigsCopyright & PermissionsCopyright © 2004 American Speech-Language-Hearing AssociationPDF DownloadLoading ...
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it