MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

GENE EXPRESSION IN TENOCYTES SUGGESTS DEGNERATIVE TENDON TEARS ATTEMPT TO HEAL

2013· article· en· W2100669138 on OpenAlexaff
A. Fearon, Jill Cook, Paul N. Smith, Alex Scott

Bibliographic record

VenueBritish Journal of Sports Medicine · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicShoulder Injury and Treatment
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTendonTendinopathyExtracellular matrixTearsMedicinePathologySurgeryBiologyCell biology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction The breakdown of the extracellular matrix (ECM) is well recognised in tendinopathy and likely the cause of degenerative tendon tears. Tendinopathy and degenerative tears can be hard and expensive to treat. Understanding the cellular processes that lead to ECM breakdown will likely lead to improved treatments. With this in mind, the gene transcript profile for extracellular matrix remodelling of tendon specimens from people with greater trochanteric pain syndrome (GTPS) and associated gluteal tendon tears were compared to an age and sex matched reference group. Methods Tendon specimens were collected from six participants undergoing gluteal tendon reconstruction for long standing (mean duration=41 months) GTPS, and four participants from an age-matched reference group (REF) of hip OA patients asymptomatic for GTPS. Specimens were collected using sterile technique and were stored at −80°C. RNA was isolated via laser capture micro-dissection (LCM) of areas of tendon that typified tendon rather than para-tendon or vessels within the specimen—identified using light microscopy and H&E staining. Specimens were tested using the SABiosciences array (PAHS-013). Immunohistochemistry was used to confirm the site of a subset of the expressed genes. Results We report on gene regulation changes of at least five fold that were seen in the GTPS group compared to the REF group. Genes involved in extracellular matrix modelling were both up regulated (MMP7) and down regulated (MMP3). The following cell adhesion genes were up regulated: ITGAV, NCAM1, ITGAM, while ITG3 was down regulated. The following genes involved in ECM synthesis were up regulated (LAMC1, COL1A1, COL5A1, Col6A1), while ADMATS1, LAMB3, VTN were down regulated. Conclusions This paper presents a novel method of tissue specimen selection (LCM), reducing the likelihood of RNA contamination from cells other than tenocytes. Further, these results suggest that there is increased cell activity and collagen production indicating that the tendon is continuing to actively remodel despite prolonged tissue damage. This supports the role of appropriate advice regarding tendon loading and compression, exercises to strengthen the musclo-tendinous unit, and ongoing support to patients. Recovery from tendinopathy may be possible—even in longstanding cases.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBritish Journal of Sports Medicine→Same topicShoulder Injury and Treatment→French-language works237,207→