MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2100707393 · doi:10.1525/jlca.2003.8.1.116

Brazilian <i>Mulatice</i>: Performing Race, Gender, and the Nation

2003· article· pt· W2100707393 on OpenAlex
Natasha Pravaz

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Latin American Anthropology · 2003
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicMusic History and Culture
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRace (biology)HumanitiesSociologyArtGender studies

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Este artigo analisa a figura da mulata no imaginario brasileiro situando‐a no contexto do mito da mesticagem e procura estudar a relaçāo complexa que as mulheres cariocas tên com este ideal social. As experiências de mulheres no mundo do samba demonstram que a performance da mulatice demanda trabalho corporal e discursive De fato, a identidade da mulata não se opõe ´ de categorias como "branca" ou "negra", pois o conceito de raca no Brasil é tanto bipolar como contínuo. Por exemplo, mulheres que se auto‐definem como negras ao mesmo tempo utilizam o mito da mestiçagem para ganhar acesso ´ remuneração econômica e reconhecimento social. Isto é possível através da mulatice e de usos estratégicos da cultura afro‐brasileira, dancando o samba em boates e desfiles de carnaval. O uso da "hibridaçño estratégica" permite que jovens mulheres sejam alguem" num país que oferece escassas oportunidades aos afro‐descendentes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.746
Threshold uncertainty score0.996

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.007
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it