The effect of circulation lifetime and drug-to-lipid ratio of intravenously administered lipid nanoparticles on the biodistribution and immunostimulatory activity of encapsulated CpG-ODN
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The encapsulation of conventional drugs in lipid nanoparticles (LNs) has been extensively utilized to enhance therapeutic activity by altering their pharmacokinetic (PK) and biodistribution (BD) properties. We have previously shown that the immunostimulatory activity of unmethylated cytidine-guanosine (CpG)-containing immunostimulatory oligodeoxynucleotides (ODN) is greatly enhanced when encapsulated in an LN (LN CpG-ODN). Here, we investigate the effect of circulation lifetime (determined by lipid composition) and drug-to-lipid (D/L) ratio of intravenously (i.v.) administered LN CpG-ODN on PK, BD, and cellular uptake and correlate these parameters with the immunostimulatory activity. Results from these studies show that despite significant differences in the circulation lifetime and the D/L ratio, the immune response is similar with respect to immune cell activation and cytolytic activity in the spleen and the blood compartments. Our findings indicate that the benefits of liposomal nanoparticles for the delivery of immunomodulatory drugs such as CpG-ODN are defined by a different paradigm than that for conventional drugs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it