MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2100829286 · doi:10.1109/pesw.2000.847348

Multi-teriminal UPFC for power system deregulation

2002· article· en· W2100829286 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venue2000 IEEE Power Engineering Society Winter Meeting. Conference Proceedings (Cat. No.00CH37077) · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPower System Optimization and Stability
Canadian institutionsConcordia UniversityPolytechnique MontréalMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUnified power flow controllerElectric power transmissionConvertersElectric power systemFlexible AC transmission systemTransmission lineComputer scienceController (irrigation)Transmission systemPower (physics)Power transmissionLine (geometry)Control theory (sociology)VoltageTransmission (telecommunications)EngineeringControl (management)Power flowElectrical engineeringTelecommunicationsPhysicsMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

One original purpose of FACTS controllers is to increase the transmission capacity of existing lines thus deferring the necessity of building new lines. FACTS, such as the unified power flow controller (UPFC), have also been regarded as controllers for routing power in the market-driven, deregulated power systems. Hitherto, the UPFC has been conceived to control the complex powers through a radial line. This paper presents the concept of a multi-terminal UPFC (M-UPFC), which serves to control the complex powers of several transmission lines converging towards (or radiating from) a transmission node. In order to show that a M-UPFC can be built, that it has stable operation and that it has all the control degrees of freedom of UPFCs, a laboratory model based on 3 units of 3-phase, voltage-source converters has been assembled and tested.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.859
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.204
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it