Cloning, sequence analysis, and expression of gene <i>alyPI</i> encoding an alginate lyase from marine bacterium <i>Pseudoalteromonas</i> sp. CY24
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The alginate lyase encoding gene (alyPI) of marine bacterium Pseudoalteromonas sp. CY24 was cloned using a battery of PCR techniques. Gene alyPI was composed of a 1575 bp open reading frame encoding a protein of 57.4 kDa containing 524 amino acid residues with a signal peptide of 23 amino acids. The AlyPI protein was expressed in Escherichia coli with a His-tag sequence fused at the C-terminal end and purified to electrophoretic homogeneity using Ni-sepharose affinity chromatography. AlyPI was most active at 40 degrees C and pH 7.0 in the presencce of 0.1 mol/L NaCl and stable over a broad range of pH, 6.0-10.6. The presence of Na+, K+, Mn2+, Ca2+, and Fe3+ can enhance the enzyme activity. The alginate lyase consensus region YFKAGXYXQ, regarded as a striking feature at the C termini of several alginate lyase of ~30 kDa, was found in AlyPI, which belongs to the ~60 kDa group. Another nine amino acid consensus region, YXRSELREM, only found in G-specific alginate lyases previously existed in AlyPI, which could degrade sodium alginate, M blocks, and G blocks and appeared to be a broad substrate-specific alginate lyase.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".