Topoisomerase I Amino Acid Substitutions, Gly185Arg and Asp325Glu, Confer Camptothecin Resistance in <i>Leishmania donovani</i>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The antitumor compound camptothecin (CPT) is also recognized for its specific activity against Leishmania donovani topoisomerase I (Topo-I). In consequence, defining CPT resistance mechanisms represents an important strategic tool in the acquisition of a better understanding of its mode of action. In the present study, we selected a single highly resistant L. donovani strain termed LdRCPT.160 by stepwise exposure to CPT. Gene sequencing revealed two single nucleotide mutations in the LdRCPT.160 LdTOP1A gene, resulting in two amino acid substitutions (Gly185Arg and Asp325Glu) in the protein. Moreover, these two substitutions observed in the LdTOP1A protein were correlated with a decreased Topo-I DNA relaxation activity in these resistant parasites. Nevertheless, there was no change in the LdTOP1A gene expression level. Interestingly, transfection studies of the LdRCPT.160 LdTOP1A gene in its wild-type counterpart showed that it induced CPT resistance. Site-directed mutagenesis studies demonstrated that, despite a substantial level of resistance conferred by the Gly185Arg and Asp325Glu substitutions separately, both were essential to reach a high-resistance phenotype. Of interest, the amino acid substitutions observed in LdRCPT.160 LdTOP1A protein occurred near the amino acids previously predicted to interact with CPT, providing new insight into the mechanism of CPT molecular action.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".