The Americas between nation-identity and relation-identity: literary dialogues.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Este texto analisa a representação de identidade entre fissuras e fusões culturais em obras selecionadas de escritores panamericanos. Neste processo, o trabalho problematiza o conceito de ‘transculturação’ com o objetivo de explicar fluxos globais que determinam a consciência e o imaginário de pessoas vivendo no Caribe, Estados Unidos e Canadá. Argumenta também que tanto a identidade-nação quanto a identidade-relação alimentam formas e práticas culturais fractais entre e através de fronteiras permeáveis e postula o símbolo do mangue como uma das encruzilhadas transculturais novo-mundistas. Abstract: this essay examines the representation of identity between cultural fissures and cultural fusions in select works by Pan-American writers. In the process, it problematizes the concept of ‘transculturation’ to explain global fluxes that determine the cultural consciousness and imaginaire of people living in the Caribbean, the United States, and Canada. It argues that both nation-identity and relation-identity nourish fractal cultural forms and practices in between and across permeable borders and posits the symbol of the mangrove as one of the New World transcultural crossroads.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.017 | 0.026 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.010 | 0.008 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".