Increasing mammalian cardiomyocyte contractility with residues identified in trout troponin C
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Ca2+ sensitivity of force generation in trout cardiac myocytes is significantly greater than that from mammalian hearts. One mechanism that we have suggested to be responsible, at least in part, for this high Ca2+ sensitivity is the isoform of cardiac troponin C (cTnC) found in trout hearts (ScTnC), which has greater than twice the Ca2+ affinity of mammalian cTnC (McTnC). Here, through a series of mutations, the residues in ScTnC responsible for its high Ca2+ affinity have been identified as being Asn2, Ile28, Gln29, and Asp30. When these residues in McTnC were mutated to the trout-equivalent amino acid, the Ca2+ affinity of the molecule, determined by monitoring the fluorescence of a Trp inserted for a Phe at residue 27, is comparable to that of ScTnC. To determine how a McTnC mutant containing Asn2, Ile28, Gln29, and Asp30 (NIQD McTnC) affects the Ca2+ sensitivity of force generation, endogenous cTnC in single, chemically skinned rabbit cardiomyocytes was replaced with either wild-type McTnC or NIQD McTnC. Our results demonstrate that the cardiomyocytes containing NIQD McTnC were approximately twice as sensitive to Ca2+, illustrating that a McTnC mutant with similar Ca2+ affinity as ScTnC can be used to sensitize mammalian cardiac myocytes to Ca2+.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".