Acute Kidney Injury: Arterial Spin Labeling to Monitor Renal Perfusion Impairment in Mice—Comparison with Histopathologic Results and Renal Function
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: To determine if arterial spin-labeling (ASL) magnetic resonance (MR) imaging can show serial changes in renal perfusion in mice with ischemia-induced acute kidney injury (AKI) and to compare imaging results with those of renal histologic examination and inulin and para-aminohippuric acid (PAH) clearance. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this animal care committee-approved study, AKI was induced in C57Bl/6 mice (n = 26) by clamping the right renal pedicle for 35 minutes for moderate (n = 16) or 45 minutes (n = 11) for severe AKI. Renal perfusion was measured in 10 animals with moderate and seven animals with severe AKI before and at five time points 1-28 days after surgery by using ASL with a 7-T MR imaging unit. Kidney volume loss and histologic evidence of acute tubular injury were assessed. Inulin and PAH clearance was determined in four animals with moderate and six animals with severe AKI to evaluate renal function and plasma flow for statistical analysis. Repeated measures analysis of variance, unpaired t tests, and correlation analysis were used. RESULTS: Renal perfusion values at day 7 were significantly reduced after moderate (56% ± 8; P < .01) and severe (33% ± 6; P < .001) AKI compared with presurgery values. Renal perfusion had returned to baseline levels at day 21 after moderate (96% ± 14) and remained compromised until day 28 after severe (46 % ± 9; P < .05) AKI. At day 28, for moderate versus severe AKI, kidney volume (84% ± 6 vs 60% ± 5; P < .05), degree of tubular injury (5.6% ± 1.8 vs 15.8% ± 2.4; P < .01), and inulin and para-aminohippuric acid clearance (47.5 µL/min ± 5.6 vs 7.3 µL/min ± 2.7; P < .001 and 100.8 µL/min ± 24.3 vs 4.8 µL/min ± 1.0; P < .001, respectively) were significantly different. Relative renal perfusion at days 7-28 significantly correlated with kidney volume loss (P < .01) and tubular injury (P < .05) 4 weeks after AKI. CONCLUSION: ASL allows evaluation of renal perfusion impairment associated with kidney volume loss and histologic changes after AKI in mice and may serve as a noninvasive biomarker for AKI.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".