MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2101207775 · doi:10.2118/2007-018

Bituminous Ore Characterization by Integrating Low-Field NMR With Density and Particle Size Distribution Measurements

2007· article· en· W2101207775 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Yan-Xia Niu, Apostolos Kantzas

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian International Petroleum Conference · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicNMR spectroscopy and applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Research ChairsShell Canada
KeywordsAsphaltCharacterization (materials science)Particle-size distributionMaterials scienceField (mathematics)Particle (ecology)Particle sizeComposite materialNanotechnologyChemical engineeringEngineeringGeologyMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Low field NMR was demonstrated as a useful tool for a fast, non-destructive method to calculate the bitumen, water and solids content of oil sands ore. However, on occasion it was found that the presence of clay bound water ends upoverlapping the bitumen NMR signals. Thus in such cases it is difficult to accurately determine fluid content from T2 relaxation only. This paper proposes a somewhat more complex method for the determination of fluid and solids content of oil sands byintegrating a density measurement to the NMR algorithm. By a fast measurement of both the weight and the volume of the sample and subsequently its bulk density, an independent solid content estimate is provided, which in turn helps in tightening up the fluid content estimates. Preliminary work to date indicates that the combined density-NMR method matches much better the results of Dean-Stark extraction than NMR alone. Particle size distribution analysis of the solids after Dean-Stark extraction is also shown to correlate with the fast relaxation components of the water spectra in both oil sands ore and in water saturated sand extracted from the ore. The latter is obtained through a vacuum saturation step of the extracted sand by brine, followed by a centrifugal desaturation of the sand to irreducible saturation. The methodology was testedusing samples from four wells from Athabasca oil sands. Methodology and results are presented in the paper. Introduction With the declining production of conventional oil and gas, exploration and development of the unconventional resources becomes crucial for the future energy supply. Many projects have been invested and expanded into the massive oil sands deposits in Alberta, Canada. One of the big challenges in the oil sands development is how to predict and evaluate the bitumen reserves accurately and exploit them as economically as possible. This paper discusses how low-field NMR technology can be applied to determine the amount of bitumen, water and solids in oil sands. Previous works1,2,3,4,5 have shown that for water and bitumen content, there was a correlation between NMR-basedalgorithm and Dean-Stark extraction. For the time being, Dean-Stark method is an accepted industry standard for core analysis. However, the advantage of low-field NMR technology is that the NMR measurement on rocks directly correlates to the hydrogen nuclei only from the fluid6,7, it can provide quick solutions, is simple to operate and is non-destructive to core samples. Because of the unique characteristics of oil sands such as extremely high viscosity and potentially high amount of clay, it is not easy for the current low-field NMR spectrometer to differentiate bitumen spectra and clay-bound water signals. In order to fully use this advanced technology to calculate the bitumen content in oil sands accurately and try to replace the tedious Dean-Stark procedures, an extra experiment - density measurement - has been integrated. To further investigate the behavior of the bound water in NMR spectra, particle size analysis has also been incorporated. The study between particle size distribution and NMR spectra for oil sands is still in very initial stage.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.227
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2007
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian International Petroleum ConferenceSame topicNMR spectroscopy and applicationsFrench-language works237,207