Analysis of substage associations in prophase I of meiosis in floral buds of wild‐type <i>Arabidopsis thaliana</i> (Brassicaceae)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We developed an improved cytological protocol for producing high quality, light microscope images of plant meiotic chromosomes. Because the technique works on species with small genomes and thick microsporocyte cell walls, it should be useful for studying the wild relatives of Arabidopsis and other eudicots with small genomes. Combining this improved fixation protocol with our new analysis of associated substages in floral buds, we can unambiguously assign individual meiotic cells to particular substages of prophase I in Arabidopsis thaliana, even for difficult distinctions such as that between late zygotene or early diplotene. In this report we provide the first estimate of the individual duration of the zygotene and pachytene substages (4.8 h and 10.0 h, respectively) in A. thaliana. We also have examined the diffuse substage of prophase I and report that during this post-pachytene substage, nuclei retain the association of homologous nucleolus organizer regions and homologous centromeres, despite the generally diffuse chromatin and generally unpaired chromosome regions. Additionally, we have observed that centromeric regions of the chromosomes of diffuse-stage nuclei are highly condensed, more so than those of any other substage of prophase I.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".