Duplication of the STS region in males is a benign copy‐number variant
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Copy-number variants (CNVs) are a common finding in the human genome, with copy gains occurring at a higher frequency than losses in several databases of genomic variants in normal individuals. Copy gains of the steroid sulfatase (STS) gene have been seen in both males and females. Although deletion of STS in males is known to cause X-linked ichthyosis, the clinical significance of STS copy gains is less clear, with the duplication reported in individuals with abnormal phenotypes and normal relatives. We identified 72 males submitted to our laboratory for microarray-based comparative genomic hybridization with duplications in the STS region (chrX:6,465,812-8,093,195). In 40 (56%) patients, maternal blood was available, and the duplication was found to be inherited from the patient's apparently phenotypically normal mother in each of the 40 patients. We also identified three females who inherited a duplication of the STS region from phenotypically normal fathers, and a phenotypically normal uncle who had the same duplication as his nephews. In the remaining cases the inheritance could not be confirmed owing to lack of parental samples available for testing. Of the 72 subjects, 10 (14%) had an additional CNV elsewhere in the genome known to be clinically significant and likely causative of the patient's presenting symptoms. Based on the frequency with which duplications have been identified in clinically normal and abnormal individuals, we suggest a gain of STS in males is a population variant and unlikely to be clinically significant.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".