Re: Sexual Behaviors, Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity in Adult Intersexuals: A Pilot Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No AccessJournal of UrologyCLINICAL UROLOGY: Letters to the Editor1 Oct 2002Re: Sexual Behaviors, Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity in Adult Intersexuals: A Pilot Study Kenneth J. Zucker Kenneth J. ZuckerKenneth J. Zucker View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(05)64501-6AboutFull TextPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail "Re: Sexual Behaviors, Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity in Adult Intersexuals: A Pilot Study." The Journal of Urology, 168(4 Part 1), pp. 1507–1508 References 1 : Hermaphrodites with attitude: mapping the emergence of intersex political activism. GLQ1998; 4: 189. Google Scholar 2 : Intersexuality and gender identity differentiation. Annu Rev Sex Res1999; 10: 1. Google Scholar 3 : Gender assignment and reassignment in 46, XY pseudohermaphroditism and related conditions. J Clin Endocrinol Metab1999; 84: 3455. Google Scholar 4 : Psychological outcome in congenital adrenal hyperplasia. In: Therapeutic Outcome of Endocrine Disorders: Efficacy, Innovation and Quality of Life. Edited by . New York: Springer-Verlag2000: 186. Google Scholar 5 : Evaluation of sex- and gender-assignment decisions in patients with physical intersex conditions: a methodological and statistical note. J Sex Marital Ther2002; 28: 269. Google Scholar Child and Adolescent Gender Identity ClinicChild Psychiatry ProgramCentre for Addiction and Mental Health–Clarke Division250 College St.Toronto, Ontario M5T 1R8Canada© 2002 by American Urological Association, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 168Issue 4 Part 1October 2002Page: 1507-1508 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2002 by American Urological Association, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Kenneth J. Zucker More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".