Hyperactivation of <i>Rhizomucor miehei</i> lipase by hydrophobic xerogels
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Although a variety of approaches exist for the immobilization of enzymes, the "science" of enzyme immobilization is still in its infancy. In recent years, considerable interest has developed regarding the use of xerogels for enzyme immobilization. There are several advantages to xerogels for enzyme immobilization, including the opportunity to produce them in defined shapes or thin films and the ability to manipulate their physical characteristics (e.g., porosity, hydrophobicity, and optical properties). In this study we examined the effect of xerogel hydrophobicity on the activity of lipase (EC 3.2.2.3) from Rhizomucor miehei. The hydrophobicity of the xerogels was manipulated by generating xerogels with various molar ratios of propyltrimethoxysilane (PTMS) to tetramethoxysilane (TMOS), from 1:1 to 10:1. The belief was that, by increasing the proportion of propyl groups, the hydrophobicity of the resulting xerogel would be increased. Differences in the hydrophobicity of the resulting xerogels were confirmed using water-affinity studies. Two approaches were taken for water-affinity determinations by examining the ability of the xerogels to remove water from air (controlled humidity) and from water-saturated isopropyl ether. Xerogels with higher propyl content showed a reduced affinity for water. A crude lipase preparation from Rhizomucor miehei was then contacted with sized xerogel particulates and the effect of the xerogel on lipase activity was determined. The presence of the xerogel resulted in hyperactivation of the lipase. Analysis of the protein adsorption revealed changes in the profile of proteins adsorbed to the xerogel based on the hydrophobicity of the xerogel. Based on estimations of the specific activity of the hyperactivated lipase, a minimum hyperactivation of 207% was observed. Part of the hyperactivation may be attributable to xerogel-lipase interactions, but also to the adsorption of a component from the crude lipase preparation that may complex with the lipase and the xerogel producing a stabilizing effect. Further improvements in hyperactivation and selectivity of the xerogels is likely possible by working at lower PTMS:TMOS ratios than those investigated in this study.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".