Analytical Modeling of PEM Fuel Cell Gas Diffusion Layers Deformation under Compression: Part 2 - Nonlinear Behaviour Region
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In the Proton exchange membrane PEM fuel cell stack, the porous gas diffusion layer (GDL) provides mechanical support for the membrane assembly against the compressive loads imposed by bipolar plates. In this paper, using assumption of existing gap between the fibers in the GDL micro-structure, an analytical model proposed in first part of this study for linear region is extended to predict the GDL nonlinear mechanical behaviour in low compressive pressures. The present unit cell model covers salient microstructural parameters and properties of the fibrous porous medium including: carbon fiber diameter, elastic modulus, pore size distribution, gap size distribution between fibers. A comparison between the present model and the GDL stress-strain data shows that the assumption of closing gap between the fibers during compression can accurately describe the GDL nonlinear behaviour. The proposed model also provides useful information about the microstructural properties of the GDL during compression such as gap distribution between fibers that can be used in the GDL transport properties prediction.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it