Bibliographic record
Abstract
Division of evaporites into those types that retain information about primary mineralogy, textures, and structures ("primary" evaporites) and those types so extensively altered that few or no primary features remain ("secondary" evaporites). Only primary evaporites can give unequivocal data bout their marine or non-marine origin. To help evaluate such primary deposits they have been further divided using the following attributes: (1) whether the depositional setting was marine or non-marine; (2) whether the source water was (A) seawater, (B) meteoric, (C) hydrothermal, (D) diagenetic, (E) volcanogenic, or (F) mixed. Specific criteria for making distinctions are: (1) kinds of fossils, (2) sedimentology of the associated non-saline facies, (3) kinds of primary saline minerals, (4) association of such saline minerals, both in qualitative and quantitative terms, (5) trace element, isotope, and fluid inclusion geochemistry of such saline minerals.--Modified journal abstract.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.019 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.010 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".