In vitro andin vivo biocompatibility of chitosan-xanthan polyionic complex
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A novel hydrogel, CHITOXAN(TM) (CH-X), has potential as a vehicle for controlled drug delivery. The hydrogel is obtained by complexation of two polysaccharides, chitosan and xanthan. In the present work we investigated the biocompatibility of the complex using in vitro and in vivo models. The cytotoxic effects of CH-X microspheres as well as their degradation products at different concentrations were assessed on fibroblasts (fibroblast cell line L-929) using 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazole-2yl)-2,5-triphenyl tetrazolium) (MTT). The test is based on mitochondrial dehydrogenase cell activity as an indicator of cell viability. Interleukin-1beta (IL-1beta) and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) cytokines as well as nitric oxide (NO) production by macrophages (macrophage cell line J-774) were examined as indicators of cell activation. In vivo biocompatibility assessment was performed for 1 to 12 weeks. This study was performed using tablets obtained after compression of CH-X particles implanted at the subcutaneous level in male Wistar rats. CH-X biocompatibility and degradation were investigated using histological studies. Light and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) analyses were used to determine the foreign-body reaction and phagocytosis of the implants by macrophages. Fibroblast exposition to CH-X particles and degradation products did not show cytotoxic effects as measured by MTT test. TNF-alpha production was dependent on CH-X particles concentration, whereas IL-1beta production was found to be dose independent. CH-X extract products stimulated TNF-alpha secretion when used at the highest concentration (10 mg/mL), notably after 28 days' degradation time. No effect was observed on IL-1beta production when CH-X extracts were used in comparison to the control. The effects of CH-X particles on NO secretion were similar as on TNF-alpha. Histological studies showed that CH-X tablets broke down into particles which progressively degraded into smaller fragments. A significant fraction of the fragments was ingested by the macrophages after 12 weeks of implantation. Light microscopy studies showed a weak foreign-body reaction as a function of time and the fibrous layer thickness decreased with time of implantation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".