MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2101471654 · doi:10.1090/mcom3050

Unconditional class group tabulation of imaginary quadratic fields to |Δ|<2⁴⁰

2015· article· en· W2101471654 on OpenAlexafffund
Anton Mosunov, Michael J. Jacobson

Bibliographic record

VenueMathematics of Computation · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAdvanced Combinatorial Mathematics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of CalgaryUniversity of Waterloo
FundersAlberta Innovates - Technology Futures
KeywordsMathematicsQuadratic equationGroup (periodic table)TRACE (psycholinguistics)Riemann hypothesisDiscriminantCombinatoricsBounded functionFactorizationPure mathematicsMathematical analysisAlgorithmGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present an improved algorithm for tabulating class groups of imaginary quadratic fields of bounded discriminant. Our method uses classical class number formulas involving theta-series to compute the group orders unconditionally for all Δ ≢ 1 ( mod 8 ) . \Delta \not \equiv 1 \pmod {8}. The group structure is resolved using the factorization of the group order. The 1 mod 8 1 \bmod 8 case was handled using the methods of Jacobson, Ramachandran, and Williams including the batch verification method based on the Eichler-Selberg trace formula to remove dependence on the Extended Riemann Hypothesis. Our new method enabled us to extend the previous bound of | Δ | > 2 ⋅ 10 11 |\Delta | > 2 \cdot 10^{11} to 2 40 2^{40} . Statistical data in support of a variety of conjectures is presented, along with new examples of class groups with exotic structures.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.059
Threshold uncertainty score0.196

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.004
Open science0.0030.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0590.020

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.057
GPT teacher head0.345
Teacher spread0.288 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMathematics of ComputationSame topicAdvanced Combinatorial MathematicsFrench-language works237,207