Impact of switch of vascular access type on key clinical and laboratory parameters in chronic haemodialysis patients
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Observational studies demonstrate poor clinical outcomes in chronic haemodialysis patients with venous catheters as vascular access. This longitudinal study examines the impact of vascular access change on key clinical and laboratory parameters. METHODS: We studied 2616 haemodialysis patients who had no or one vascular access change between January 2002 and June 2003. Two hundred and seventy-one patients switched from a catheter to an arteriovenous (AV) access (AV fistula or graft) and 69 patients from an AV access to a catheter. Accesses remained unchanged in 430 patients with catheters, and in 1846 patients with an AV access, who served as controls. Levels of serum albumin, white blood cell count (WBC), enPCR, eKdrt/V, blood haemoglobin and erythropoietin dosage were obtained monthly. Data were averaged over 6 months preceding (pre) and 6 months following the access change (post). Differences between post- and pre-access change were compared to changes in respective parameters between the last and first 6 months of the study period in controls. RESULTS: The change from a catheter to an AV access was associated with a rise of serum albumin (+0.12 g/dL; P < 0.001), enPCR (+0.05 g/kg body weight/day; P = 0.001) and haemoglobin (+0.41 g/dL; P < 0.001) and a decrease in WBC (-370/microL; P = 0.048). Conversely, switching from an AV access to a catheter was followed by a significant fall in albumin (-0.11 g/dL; P = 0.035), enPCR (-0.07 g/ kg body weight/day; P = 0.001) and eKdrt/V (-0.09; P < 0.001) and a rise in erythropoietin dosage (+89 IU/kg body weight/week; P = 0.002), as compared to controls. CONCLUSION: Change from a catheter to an AV access seems to alleviate malnutrition, inflammation and anaemia. Efforts to replace catheters with fistulae or grafts should be intensified.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".