Relações entre Práticas Docentes de Futuros Professores do Ensino Primário e Material Escolar: Análise de uma Experiência de Utilização de Recursos de Tecnologias da Informação e da Comunicação (TIC)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Este artigo apresenta uma análise de práticas docentes de futuros professores do ensino primário em relação à utilização de recursos de Tecnologias da informação e da comunicação (TIC) no âmbito de uma atividade de ensino-aprendizagem em contexto de formação prática (estágio). Ele relata os resultados de uma análise lexicométrica de entrevistas telefônicas realizadas com 17 estudantes do 3o e 4o anos do Bacharelado em educação pré-escolar e ensino primário de quatro universidades francófonas do Québec. Apesar do reconhecimento por parte dos futuros professores das contribuições das TIC no processo de desenvolvimento das aprendizagens dos alunos e das competências profissionais dos professores, os resultados sugerem uma utilização ainda marginal, envolvendo principalmente softwares de tratamento de texto e Internet, limitada a poucas disciplinas escolares.Palabras clave: Práticas docentes, recursos de TIC, futuros professores, ensino primário, material escolar. This article presents the analysis of the practices of preservice elementary school teachers regarding the use of Information and Communication Technologies resources during a teaching/learning activity in a practice teaching context. It reports on the results of a lexicometric analysis of the transcribed verbatims of telephone interviews of seventeen 3rd and 4th year student teachers in four Quebec francophone universities. Despite the fact that the preservice teachers recognize that ICT contribute to teaching as well as to the development of the student’s learning and of their professional teaching competencies, the results suggest only a marginal usage of the ICT resources mostly limited to word processing and the internet and only with small number of school subjects.Keywords: Teaching practices, ICT, resources, preservice teachers, elementary teaching, teaching materials.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.014 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".