MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Tissue-specific and isoform-specific changes in MCT1 and MCT4 in heart and soleus muscle during a 1-yr period

2001· article· en· W2101740482 on OpenAlexaff
Hideo Hatta, Mio Tonouchi, Dragana Miskovic, Yuxiang Wang, John J. Heikkila, Arend Bonen

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Physiology-Endocrinology and Metabolism · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMitochondrial Function and Pathology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSoleus muscleGene isoformMessenger RNAInternal medicineEndocrinologyPeriod (music)BiologySkeletal muscleChemistryBiochemistryGeneMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We examined the postnatal changes (days 10, 36, 84, 160, 365) of monocarboxylate transporters (MCT)1 and MCT4 in rat heart and soleus muscle. In the heart, MCT1 protein and mRNA remained unaltered from day 10 until 1 yr of age. Both MCT4 protein and mRNA in the heart were detected at 10 days of age, but the MCT4 protein and transcript were not detected thereafter. In the soleus muscle, MCT1 protein (+38%) and mRNA (+136%) increased during the first 84 days and remained stable until 1 yr of age. In contrast, soleus MCT4 protein decreased by 90% over the course of 1 yr, with the most rapid decrease (-60%) occurring by day 84 (P < 0.05). At the same time, MCT4 mRNA was increased by 74% from days 10 to 84 (P < 0.05), remaining stable thereafter. In conclusion, developmental changes in MCT transport proteins are tissue specific and isoform specific. Furthermore, it appears that MCT1 expression in the heart and MCT1 and MCT4 expression in the soleus are regulated by pretranslational processes, whereas posttranscriptional processes regulate MCT4 expression in the soleus muscle.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations36
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of Physiology-Endocrinology and MetabolismSame topicMitochondrial Function and PathologyFrench-language works237,207