MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2101744197 · doi:10.1007/s10530-009-9489-1

Aquatic invaders: from success factors to ecological risk assessment: introduction

2009· article· en· W2101744197 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
G. van der Velde, R.S.E.W. Leuven, Rob Leewis, A. bij de Vaate

Bibliographic record

VenueBiological Invasions · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAquatic Invertebrate Ecology and Behavior
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInvasive speciesOutreachBiologyIntroduced speciesWindsorEcologyIndigenousLegislationEnvironmental planningPolitical scienceGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The International Conference on Aquatic Invasive Species (ICAIS) began as a Canada/USA initiative, with its genesis as a conference to address the appearance of zebra mussels in the Great Lakes in the 1980s. By the late 1990s the conference began to address other non-indigenous aquatic invasive species (AIS) and it continued to evolve to incorporate new and emerging AIS issues. The conference currently functions as the most comprehensive international forum for the review of accumulated scientific knowledge, the presentation of the latest field research, the introduction of new technological developments for prevention, monitoring and control and discussion of policy, legislation, public education and outreach initiatives to raise awareness of the impacts of aquatic invasive species and prevent new introductions. The 15th ICAIS was held in Nijmegen, The Netherlands, September 23–27, 2007. This conference was the second one organized in Europe. Selected contributions of the 12th ICAIS (Windsor, Ontario, Canada, June 9–12, 2003) were published in an earlier special issue of Biological Invasions (vol. 8, number 1, 2006). As a guest editor Elizabeth Muckle-Jeffs wrote in that issue: ‘‘It is our hope that they serve as a record of the ongoing effort by the participants of the conference to bring the problem of aquatic invasive species to the attention of policy makers and the general public’’. Since then biological invasions are increasingly important, influencing ecosystems all over the world. The present special issue of Biological Invasions contains selected papers from the Nijmegen conference reflecting the progress in understanding biological invasions including new approaches. The issue starts with a paper on the Rhine River as a global highway for invaders followed by a paper on traits of all invasive aquatic macroinvertebrate species in North America and Europe. A series of papers devoted to amphipod invaders follows. Amphipods belong to the most successful invaders and are—because of their species richness, abundance, size and omnivorous G. van der Velde (&) Department of Animal Ecology and Ecophysiology, Institute for Water and Wetland Research, Radboud University Nijmegen, Heyendaalseweg 135, 6525 AJ Nijmegen, The Netherlands e-mail: g.vandervelde@science.ru.nl

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.033
Threshold uncertainty score0.996

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0380.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.119
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.167 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiological InvasionsSame topicAquatic Invertebrate Ecology and BehaviorFrench-language works237,207