MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2101747769 · doi:10.1093/jat/32.9.787

Retrospective Diagnosis of an Adverse Drug Reaction in a Breastfed Neonate: Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry Quantification of Dextropropoxyphene and Norpropoxyphene in Newborn and Maternal Hair

2008· article· en· W2101747769 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Virginie Rigourd, Ammar Amirouche, A. Tasseau, Pascal Kintz, Raphaël Serreau

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Analytical Toxicology · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPregnancy and Medication Impact
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBreastfeedingPropoxypheneMedicineAcetaminophenInfant formulaAdverse effectDrugBreast milkBreast feedingPediatricsObstetricsAnesthesiaPharmacologyAnalgesicChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dextropropoxyphene (DP) and norpropoxyphene (NP) are commonly used in the treatment of postpartum pain. The drug is widely prescribed in Europe and Canada and has been recently approved for use in the U.S. Its safety during breastfeeding, however, has not been fully established. Very few reports on its effects on neonates have been published. We report here the case of a mother treated with DP (6 capsules a day for 10 days) while she was breastfeeding. On day 7, her baby was lethargic and had difficulties with breastfeeding, which led to early weaning. The correlation between side effects observed in the infant and DP was made retrospectively by measuring DP and NP hair concentrations in the mother-infant pair with liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Breastfeeding mothers taking DP expose their infants to high doses of DP and NP. In agreement with previously published reports, these data indicate that acetaminophen and nonsteroidal antiinflammatories are preferable for analgesia during breastfeeding. Breastfeeding should be encouraged under most circumstances, and if the mother takes any treatment for pain, a commonly prescribed drug with pharmacologic data available must be used.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.092
Threshold uncertainty score0.482

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Analytical ToxicologySame topicPregnancy and Medication ImpactFrench-language works237,207