Non-steroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs (NSAIDs) in the Management of Patent Ductus Arteriosus (PDA) in Preterm Infants and Variations in Attitude in Clinical Practice: A Flight Around the World
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The primary objective of this review is to verify if there are differences in the diagnostic and therapeutic strategies in cases of PDA employed in different NICUs that might help explain the different percentages of duct closure, surgical ligation and outcome in these vulnerable patients. The secondary objective is to document if the selection of a specific NSAID and/or the way of administration are based on factors such as costs and local availability of drugs, as well as influenced by clinical and haemodynamic parameters, potential risks, local experience and the existing literature. Data Sources were MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library and analysis of the most important papers were performed. We examined a total of 89 trials including 15,657 neonates (with gestational ages between 22 and 35 weeks and study weights between 380 and 2500 g), due to the lack of homogeneity of case studies it was not possible to standardize for gestational age and weight. To simplify, the studies we considered were subdivided into 5 groups corresponding to 5 tables: 1- INDO-prophylaxis (15 trials); 2- IBU-prophylaxis (11 trials); 3- INDO-therapy (18 trials); 4- IBU-therapy (16 trials); 5- IBU vs INDO therapy (29 trials). Each table reports the journal, the reference, the type of study, the number of neonates enrolled, the drugs used, management after failure of the first cycle, percentage of duct closure and adverse effects. Treatment with indomethacin is prescribed prevalently in the United States and Canada. According to the data collected, prolonged treatment and administration of high doses would appear to be more effective. The early administration of indometacin has been associated with gastrointestinal bleeding, renal insufficiency, altered cerebral self-regulation and, especially when administered together with postnatal steroids, it has been correlated with isolated intestinal perforation. Ibuprofen treatment is preferred in Europe but it may be associated with nephrotoxicity and an increase in BDP and ROP, although less frequently compared to indometacin. Indometacin is associated with major nephrotoxicity, as well as with a higher incidence of NEC, intestinal perforations and a reduced cerebral blood flow. Despite this, the administration of ibuprofen does not appear to be without short- and long-term renal adverse effects.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.016 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.007 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".