Fabrication of 3-D alumina photonic bandgap structures by laser rapid prototyping. application to the design of three dimensional photonic crystal resonator antenna
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper is concerned with improving antenna performance by using photonic bandgap (PBG) structures and their design by laser rapid prototyping method. A solution is to use high dielectric constant to reduce the thickness of these antennas. The fabrication of 1-D, 2-D and 3-D PBG structures was achieved using the laser rapid prototyping technique and a sintering stage of densification with alumina as high permittivity materials. Laser rapid prototyping has proven to be an efficient and flexible tool to realize PBG structures. The electromagnetic measurements made on the 3-D alumina structures use a free space microwave measurement system to permit a nondestructive and in situ testing method over a wide frequency range to characterize the bandgap. These materials are used for their frequency properties and their ability to enhance the behaviour of a single patch antenna in order to create a directive antenna.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".