The dumortierite supergroup. I. A new nomenclature for the dumortierite and holtite groups
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Although the distinction between magnesiodumortieite and dumortierite, i.e. Mg vs . Al dominance at the partially vacant octahedral Al1 site, had met current criteria of the IMA Commission on New Minerals, Nomenclature and Classification (CNMNC) for distinguishing mineral species, the distinction between holtite and dumortierite had not, since Al and Si are dominant over Ta and (Sb, As) at the Al1 and two Si sites, respectively, in both minerals. Recent studies have revealed extensive solid solution between Al, Ti, Ta and Nb at Al1 and between Si, As and Sb at the two Si sites or nearly coincident (As, Sb) sites in dumortierite and holtite, further blurring the distinction between the two minerals. This situation necessitated revision in the nomenclature of the dumortierite group. The newly constituted dumortierite supergroup, space group Pnma (no. 62), comprises two groups and six minerals, one of which is the first member of a potential third group, all isostructural with dumortierite. The supergroup, which has been approved by the CNMNC, is based on more specific end-member compositions for dumortierite and holtite, in which occupancy of the Al1 site is critical. (1) Dumortierite group, with Al1 = Al 3+ , Mg 2+ and ☐, where ☐ denotes cation vacancy. Charge balance is provided by OH substitution for O at the O 2 , O 7 and O10 sites. In addition to dumortierite, endmember composition AlAl 6 BSi 3 O 18 , and magnesiodumortierite, endmember composition MgAl 6 BSi 3 O 17 (OH), plus three endmembers, “hydroxydumortierite”, ☐Al 6 BSi 3 O 15 (OH) 3 and two Mg-Ti analogues of dumortierite, (Mg 0.5 Ti 0.5 )Al 6 BSi 3 O 18 and (Mg 0.5 Ti 0.5 )Mg 2 Al 4 BSi 3 O 16 (OH) 2 , none of which correspond to mineral species. Three more hypothetical endmembers are derived by homovalent substitutions of Fe 3+ for Al and Fe 2+ for Mg. (2) Holtite group, with Al1 = Ta 5+ , Nb 5+ , Ti 4+ and ☐. In contrast to the dumortierite group, vacancies serve not only to balance the extra charge introduced by the incorporation of pentavalent and quadrivalent cations for trivalent cations at Al1, but also to reduce repulsion between the highly charged cations. This group includes holtite, endmember composition (Ta 0.6 ☐ 0.4 )Al 6 BSi 3 O 18 , nioboholite (2012-68), endmember composition (Nb 0.6 ☐ 0.4 )Al 6 BSi 3 O 18 , and titanoholtite (2012-69), endmember composition (Ti 0.75 ☐ 0.25 )Al 6 BSi 3 O 18 . (3) Szklaryite (2012-70) with Al1 = ☐ and an endmember formula ☐Al 6 BAs 3+ 3 O 15 . Vacancies at Al1 are caused by loss of O at O 2 and O 7 , which coordinate the Al1 with the Si sites, due to replacement of Si 4+ by As 3+ and Sb 3+ , and thus this mineral does not belong in either the dumortierite or the holtite group. Although szklaryite is distinguished by the mechanism introducing vacancies at the Al1 site, the primary criterion for identifying it is based on occupancy of the Si/As, Sb sites: (As 3+ + Sb 3+ ) > Si 4+ consistent with the dominant-valency rule. A Sb 3+ analogue to szklaryite is possible.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it