MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2102072563 · doi:10.1503/jpn.110181

Dopamine D<sub>2</sub> and D<sub>3</sub> binding in people at clinical high risk for schizophrenia, antipsychotic-naive patients and healthy controls while performing a cognitive task

2013· article· en· W2102072563 on OpenAlexafffundvenue
Ivonne Suridjan, Pablo Rusjan, Jean Addington, Alan A. Wilson, Sylvain Houle, Romina Mizrahi

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Psychiatry and Neuroscience · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoThe Wilson CentreUniversity of CalgaryCentre for Addiction and Mental Health
FundersNational Institute of Mental HealthCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsPutamenPsychologySchizophrenia (object-oriented programming)Schizoaffective disorderDopamine receptor D3PsychosisDopamine receptor D2AntipsychoticGlobus pallidusCaudate nucleusNeuroscienceInternal medicineVentral striatumStriatumRacloprideTranslocator proteinDopamineBasal gangliaPsychiatryMedicineCentral nervous system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: The dopamine (DA) D2 receptors exist in 2 states: a high-affinity state (D2 high) that is linked to second messenger systems, responsible for functional effects, exhibits high affinity for agonists (e.g., DA), and a low-affinity state that is functionally inert exhibits lower affinity for agonists. The DA D3 receptor subtype exhibits high agonist affinity, whereas the existence of the multiple affinity states is controversial. Preclinical studies in animal models of psychosis have shown a selective increase of D2 high as the common factor in psychosis, and the D3 receptor has been suggested to be involved in the pathophysiology of schizophrenia. METHODS: We studied D2 high and D3 in people at clinical high risk (CHR) for schizophrenia and in antipsychotic-naive patients with schizophrenia using the novel positron emission tomography radiotracer, [11C]-(+)-PHNO. The binding potential nondisplaceable (BP(ND)) was examined in the regions of interest (ROI; caudate, putamen, ventral striatum, globus pallidus, substantia nigra and thalamus) using an ROI and a voxel-wise approach while participants performed a cognitive task. RESULTS: We recruited 12 CHR individuals and 13 antipsychotic-naive patients with schizophrenia-spectrum disorder, whom we compared with 12 age- and sex-matched healthy controls. The BP(ND) between patients and controls did not differ in any of the ROIs, consistent with the voxel-wise analysis. Correlations between the BP(ND) in D3-rich regions and psychopathology warrant further investigation. LIMITATIONS: In the absence of resting-state (baseline) BP(ND) data, or following a depletion paradigm (i.e., α-methyl partyrosine), it is not possible to ascertain whether the lack of difference among the groups is owing to different levels of baseline DA or to release during the cognitive task. CONCLUSION: To our knowledge, the present study represents the first effort to measure the D2 and D3 receptors under a cognitive challenge in individuals putative/prodromal for schizophrenia using [11C]-(+)-PHNO.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.410
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations38
Published2013
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Psychiatry and NeuroscienceSame topicNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorFrench-language works237,207