Determinants of Erythrocyte Methotrexate Polyglutamate Levels in Rheumatoid Arthritis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Low-dose methotrexate (MTX) is the anchor drug in the treatment for rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Response to MTX is related to the intracellular MTX-polyglutamate (MTX-PG) levels and little is known about its determinants. We aimed to define the determinants of erythrocyte MTX-PG concentrations in 2 prospective cohorts of patients with RA. METHODS: Patients with RA treated with MTX from 2 longitudinal cohorts were included: 93 from the MTX-R study (Rotterdam, the Netherlands derivation cohort), and 247 from the treatment in Rotterdam Early Arthritis Cohort study (validation cohort). MTX-PG concentrations were measured at 3 months of treatment using liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry. The MTX-PG were used as outcome measure. Various sociodemographic, clinical, biochemical, and genetic factors were assessed at baseline. Associations with MTX-PG levels were analyzed using multivariate regression analysis. RESULTS: Age was positively associated with MTX-PG1 (stβ 0.23, p=0.033) and total MTX-PG (stβ 0.23, p=0.018) in the derivation cohort, and with all MTX-PG in the validation cohort (MTX-PG1: stβ 0.13, p=0.04; MTX-PG2: stβ 0.21, p=0.001; MTX-PG3: stβ 0.22, p<0.001; MTX-PG4+5: stβ 0.25, p<0.001; and total MTX-PG: stβ 0.32, p<0.001). Erythrocyte folate levels were positively associated with MTX-PG3 (stβ 0.3, p=0.021) and total MTX-PG levels (stβ 0.32, p=0.022) in the derivation cohort, which was replicated for MTX-PG3 (stβ 0.15, p=0.04) in the validation cohort. Patients with the folylpolyglutamate synthase (FPGS) rs4451422 wild-type genotype had higher concentrations of MTX-PG3 (p<0.05), MTX-PG4+5 (p<0.05), and total MTX-PG (p<0.05) in both cohorts. In the combined cohort, MTX dose was positively associated with levels of MTX-PG3 (stβ 0.23, p<0.001), MTX-PG4+5 (stβ 0.30, p<0.001), and total MTX-PG (stβ 0.20, p=0.002), but negatively associated with MTX-PG2 levels (stβ -0.22, p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Our prospective study shows that higher age, higher MTX dose, higher erythrocyte folate status, and the FPGS rs4451422 wild-type genotype are associated with higher MTX-PG concentrations. While only up to 21% of interpatient variability can be explained by these determinants, this knowledge may aid in the development of personalized treatment in RA.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".