Existence and severity of nausea and vomiting in pregnancy (NVP) with different partners
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Nausea and vomiting in pregnancy (NVP) is a widespread condition which may impact on the quality of life. Our objective was to understand the role of the placenta, which is mostly made up of fetal cells, in NVP. We examined the relationship between NVP and different partners in the same women. If a paternal contribution to placental function affects NVP, this could shed light on the genetics of the most common condition in pregnancy. We assessed nausea and vomiting in two groups of 100 women counselled by the Motherisk Program in Toronto, using a score from 1 (none) to 5 (severe with hyperemesis). The first group had >/=2 pregnancies with the same partner; the second had >/=2 pregnancies with >/=2 partners. Scores were averaged across pregnancies, partners and overall. Regression was used to separate numbers of pregnancies and partners. The 100 women having one partner reported an average score of 3.1 in their 261 pregnancies, which was similar to the score of 3.0 in 319 multi-partner pregnancies (p = 0.508). There was a positive (but weak) correlation between gravidity and NVP score (Spearman's rho = 0.21, p < 0.001) but not between partner and score. There was a linear increase in scores from 2.7 in the first pregnancy, to 4.0 in the tenth (rho = 0.948, p < 0.01). After controlling for number of pregnancies, number of partners was not associated with NVP scores (p = 0.302). NVP severity tends to increase with each successive pregnancy. Different partners have no impact on NVP severity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".