Different Genotypes of Anatoxin-Producing Cyanobacteria Coexist in the Tarn River, France
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Repeated dog deaths occurred in 2002, 2003, and 2005 after the animals drank water from the shoreline of the Tarn River in southern France. Signs of intoxication indicated acute poisoning due to a neurotoxin. Floating scum and biofilms covering pebbles were collected in the summers of 2005 and 2006 from six different sites along 30 km from the border of this river. The cyanobacterial neurotoxic alkaloid anatoxin-a and/or its methyl homolog, homoanatoxin-a, was detected in the extracts of most samples examined by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. Fifteen filamentous cyanobacteria of the order Oscillatoriales were isolated and displayed four distinct phenotypes based on morphological characteristics and pigmentation. Three of the phenotypes can be assigned to the genus Oscillatoria or Phormidium, depending on the taxonomic treatises (bacteriological/botanical) employed for identification. The fourth phenotype is typical of the genus Geitlerinema Anagnostidis 1989. Eight strains rendered axenic were analyzed for production of anatoxin-a and homoanatoxin-a, and all strains of Oscillatoria/Phormidium proved to be neurotoxic. The genetic relatedness of the new isolates was evaluated by comparison of the intergenic transcribed spacer sequences with those of six oscillatorian strains from the Pasteur Culture Collection of Cyanobacteria. These analyses showed that the neurotoxic representatives are composed of five different genotypes, three of which correspond to phenotypes isolated in this study. Our findings prove that neurotoxic oscillatorian cyanobacteria exist in the Tarn River and thus were most likely implicated in the reported dog poisonings. Furthermore, they reemphasize the importance of monitoring benthic cyanobacteria in aquatic environments to fully assess the health risks associated with these organisms.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".