Traduire la France et le Directoire dans The Columbian Orator de Caleb Bingham (1797)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le présent article fait état d’une étude des traductions de discours de personnalités militaires et politiques françaises (l’abbé Fauchet, Pierre-Auguste Adet, Napoléon Bonaparte, Lazare Nicolas Marguerite Carnot) publiées en 1797 dans l’anthologie The Columbian Orator du révérend Caleb Bingham, imprimeur à Boston. Maintes fois réédité jusque dans les années 1830, pour un total de 190 000 exemplaires, ce volume et les traductions qu’il contenait modelèrent de façon significative l’image de la France aux États-Unis. La personnalité des auteurs convoqués, les sujets abordés, le style de ces discours ainsi que le contexte global dans lequel ils furent rédigés, prononcés et traduits, apportent un éclairage sur les relations franco-américaines de cette période et font de ces traductions un cas d’école illustrant l’importance des paramètres politiques et idéologiques intervenant dans la sélection et la traduction de textes quelle que soit l’époque.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.012 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".