MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2102148792 · doi:10.1144/sp314.4

Frasnian reef evolution and palaeogeography, SE Lennard Shelf, Canning Basin, Australia

2009· article· en· W2102148792 on OpenAlexaff
Annette D. George, Kate Trinajstic, Nancy Chow

Bibliographic record

VenueGeological Society London Special Publications · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicPaleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPalaeogeographyGeologyReefPaleontologyOceanographyStructural basinTectonics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Frasnian reef complexes of the southeastern Lennard Shelf (northern Canning Basin) developed on tilt-block highs and their evolution was controlled by fault-related subsidence. Tectonic control on relative sea-level changes was, therefore, a major factor influencing Early–Middle Frasnian palaeogeography of the Lennard Shelf. However, palaeogeographic reconstruction is not consistent with simple landward (northward) backstepping and younging of reef complexes in response to basin extension and subsidence of fault blocks. Using a sequence-stratigraphic approach, in conjunction with sedimentological and biostratigraphic data, we propose that two neighbouring fault blocks (Lawford area on the eastern side of Bugle Gap and the Hull platform to the north) record a similar history and that the reef complexes on those blocks were initiated at similar times. Seven phases of Early–Middle Frasnian platform growth (Fr2–8) are identified. All are bounded by third-order flooding surfaces associated with backstepping of platform margins and three surfaces (defined by conodont Zone 4, Zone 6 and late Zone 6) correlate across the two fault blocks. Only one sequence boundary has been clearly identified and a second relative sea-level fall is proposed based on a major collapse event following progradation and associated coarse siliciclastic facies. We propose that the correlation of flooding events across the SE Lennard Shelf is related to episodes of basin-margin faulting centred on the large, long ( c . 25 km) faults which border these blocks (shelf-parallel faults for the Lawford block and an oblique north-trending transfer zone for the Hull block). There is limited evidence for relative sea-level falls and those recognized most likely resulted from eustatic events. The correlation between the Lawford block and Hull platform suggests linkage between major NW-trending shelf-parallel and oblique transfer faults and an evolved rift system by the Early Frasnian.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.347
Threshold uncertainty score0.690

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeological Society London Special PublicationsSame topicPaleontology and Stratigraphy of FossilsFrench-language works237,207