Retro-arc extension and continental rifting: a model for the Paleoproterozoic Baker Lake Basin, Nunavut<sup>1</sup>Geological Survey of Canada Contribution 20100436.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Within Baker Lake sub-basin, the ca. 1.84–1.78 Ga Baker Sequence formed in two stages. At the start of the first stage, during rift initiation, half-graben were host to siliciclastic alluvial, eolian, and lacustrine deposits and to localized felsic minette volcanics. Back-stepping of facies indicate high accommodation rates and areal expansion, which, combined with extrusion of voluminous minette volcanic rocks, are interpreted to record increased extension and rift climax. Low accommodation post-rift deposits from the second stage of basin development are relatively thin and coeval felsite domes spatially restricted. Volcanic rocks and some siliciclastic units correlate between sub-basins, and hence the interpreted history of Baker Lake sub-basin is extended across greater Baker Lake Basin. This implies that the basin formed in response to regional extension and crustal thinning. The Baker Lake Basin marks the northern extent of a series of basins that trend northeastward along the Snowbird Tectonic Zone, including an inlier of the correlative Martin Group in northern Saskatchewan. The high accommodation first stage of basin development is proposed to have been the result of intra-continental retro-arc extension during ca. 1.85–1.84 Ga formation of the Kisseynew back-arc basin of the Trans-Hudson Orogen. Upon closure of the Kisseynew back-arc basin and collision of the Superior Province with the western Churchill Province, Baker Lake Basin was subject to strike-slip faulting. The second, low accommodation stage of basin development and strike-slip faulting is proposed to record lateral tectonic escape between the Saskatchewan–Manitoba and Baffin Island – Committee Bay foci of the western Churchill – Superior Province collision.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".