Two-dimensional patterns in neural fields subject to finite transmission speed
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This work analyzes and implements finite axonal transmission speeds in two-dimensional neural populations. The biological significance of this is found in the rate of spatiotemporal change in voltage across neuronal tissue, which can be attributed to phenomena such as delays in spike propagation within axons, neurotransmitter activation and the time courses of neuron polarization and refraction. The authors build upon the finite transmission speed work in [1]. Linear analysis about a spatially homogeneous resting state of the neural population dynamics is performed. The analyses of the resulting analytical expressions guide the parameter selection for simulations. For simulation, computation of the transmission-delayed convolution between the kernel and firing rates is performed with a fast Fourier transform as in [1]. The Neural Field Simulator [2] is used to simulate the activity of the field. We extended the simulator by the implementation of a large class of kernels reflecting global excitation, global inhibition, local excitation-lateral inhibition and local inhibition-lateral excitation. Moreover, we extended the tools by an automatic root finder to compute stationary states and an automatic root finder of the characteristic equation of the linear dynamics. These latter features facilitate the user to perform the linear analysis. Further adjustments to the simulator include a provision to modify neural field variables online while simulations are ongoing and three-dimensional displays of disparate parts of the neural field, such as the external input, kernel and firing rate. We find Turing patterns appear when starting the simulations with the derived conditions for stationary instability. This is shown in Figure 1(A,B,C). Simulations with travelling wave patterns are also performed using parameter sets for the non-stationary instabilities, and the effects of finite transmission speeds are analyzed and visualized. The software tool provides a large set of analysis and visualization tools, that promises to speed up the analysis of two-dimensional neural field dynamics and hence accelerates research on neural population dynamics. Figure 1 A neural field simulation. A noisy field A evolving B into a Turing pattern C.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".