MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2102271599 · doi:10.1109/iscas.2013.6572407

High performance scalable elliptic curve cryptosystem processor in GF(2<sup>m</sup>)

2013· article· en· W2102271599 on OpenAlexaff
K.C. Cinnati Loi, Seok‐Bum Ko

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCryptography and Residue Arithmetic
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
FundersDivision of Electrical, Communications and Cyber Systems
KeywordsElliptic curve cryptographyNISTComputer scienceScalabilityElliptic curveElliptic curve point multiplicationField-programmable gate arrayMultiplication (music)Parallel computingHessian form of an elliptic curveCryptographyElliptic Curve Digital Signature AlgorithmArithmeticFinite fieldCryptosystemEmbedded systemComputer hardwarePublic-key cryptographyAlgorithmMathematicsOperating systemEncryptionDiscrete mathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The implementation of a scalable elliptic curve cryptography (ECC) processor is presented in this paper. The proposed ECC processor supports all 5 pseudo-random curves recommended by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) without the need to reconfigure the FPGA. The paper proposes a finite field arithmetic unit (FFAU) that reduces the number of clock cycles required to compute the elliptic curve point multiplication (ECPM) operation for ECC. The paper also presents a Lopez-Dahab algorithm with modified instructions to take advantage of the novel FFAU architecture. The completed scalable ECC processor (ECP) is implemented in hardware and a comparison analysis to the state-of-the-art designs is also discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.023

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.195
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCryptography and Residue ArithmeticFrench-language works237,207