Genetic Determinants of Systolic and Pulse Pressure in an Intercross Between Normotensive Inbred Rats
Bibliographic record
Abstract
By continuous monitoring of abdominal aortic blood pressure via telemetry in conscious rats, we have observed that systolic, diastolic, and pulse pressures of male Brown-Norway rats were all significantly lower than that of male Wistar-Kyoto rats, despite the fact that all of the values in both strains were within normotensive ranges. Further analyses performed in 166 animals from the progeny of an F2 intercross between Brown-Norway and Wistar-Kyoto rats revealed that, despite a high correlation between systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure, there was no correlation between pulse pressure and diastolic blood pressure, and the value of the correlation between systolic blood pressure and pulse pressure was lower than that of systolic blood pressure with diastolic blood pressure. Two major and highly significant (P<0.001) quantitative trait loci linked to pulse pressure were found on chromosome 4 (Pp1) and 16 (Pp2). Only suggestive quantitative trait loci were found for systolic blood pressure, but the strongest one (Sbp1) had the same peak and linkage probability profile as Pp1. Altogether, these data show that genetic determinants affecting pulse pressure in normotensive animals are either stronger or independent from the ones affecting systolic blood pressure and are of interest in light of evidence showing that pulse pressure is highly heritable in humans and that elevated pulse pressure is a predictor of cardiovascular risk.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".