Expression and Modulation of an Invertebrate Presynaptic Calcium Channel α1 Subunit Homolog
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Here we report the first assessment of the expression and modulation of an invertebrate alpha1 subunit homolog of mammalian presynaptic Cav2 calcium channels (N-type and P/Q-type) in mammalian cells. Our data show that molluscan channel (LCav2a) isolated from Lymnaea stagnalis is effectively membrane-targeted and electrophysiologically recordable in tsA-201 cells only when the first 44 amino acids of LCav2a are substituted for the corresponding region of rat Cav2.1. When coexpressed with rat accessory subunits, the biophysical properties of LCav2a-5'rbA resemble those of mammalian N-type calcium channels with respect to activation and inactivation, lack of pronounced calcium dependent inactivation, preferential permeation of barium ions, and cadmium block. Consistent with reports of native Lymnaea calcium currents, the LCav2a-5'rbA channel is insensitive to micromolar concentrations of omega-conotoxin GVIA and is not affected by nifedipine, thus confirming that it is not of the L-type. Interestingly, the LCav2a-5'rbA channel is almost completely and irreversibly inhibited by guanosine 5'-3-O-(thio)triphosphate but not regulated by syntaxin1, suggesting that invertebrate presynaptic calcium channels are differently modulated from their vertebrate counterparts.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".