MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Bing-Neel Syndrome: Presentation of Three Unusual Patients (P7.264)

2014· article· en· W2102333383 on OpenAlexaff
Louis Royer-Perron, F. Moreau, Sylvie Gosselin

Bibliographic record

VenueNeurology · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicChronic Myeloid Leukemia Treatments
Canadian institutionsCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de SherbrookeUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPresentation (obstetrics)MedicinePediatricsRadiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: To contribute to the description of Bing-Neel syndrome. BACKGROUND: Waldenström macroglobulinemia can cause neurological symptoms by infiltration of the central nervous system, a condition often called Bing-Neel syndrome. A recent review of the literature (Fintelmann et al., 2009) identified 50 cases. DESIGN/METHODS: We report three cases seen at our institution since 2011. RESULTS: Patient 1, a 75-year-old female, complained of acute paraparesis. She had been diagnosed with Waldenström macroglobulinemia six years before. MRI showed signal abnormalities over most of the spinal cord, with enlargement. Lumbar puncture allowed identification of lymphoplasmocytoid cells in the CSF. Treatment with corticosteroids lead initially to symptoms improvement, but the patient died despite IV and IT therapy. Patient 2, a 65-year-old female, presented with headaches. She had been diagnosed with Waldenström macroglobulinemia eight years before and had received autologous stem cell transplant. Lumbar puncture revealed an elevated intracranial pressure and lymphoplasmacytoid cells were found in the CSF. MRI showed enhancement of optic chiasm and of third, fifth, sixth, seventh and eights cranial nerves. Despite IV and IT chemotherapy, the patient’s condition deteriorated and she died one year after presentation. Patient 3, a 71-year-old male, was known for sarcoidosis and Waldenström macroglobulinemia. He was evaluated for cognitive deterioration over one year. MRI showed white matter confluent lesions and enhancing nodular lesions. He was initially diagnosed with neurosarcoidosis and treated with corticosteroids, but lack of improvement led the other lumbar punctures. Lymphoplasmocytoid cells were found in the CSF. CONCLUSIONS: All three patients had strikingly abnormal, but non specific, imaging findings. Examination of CSF after centrifugation and use of flow cytometry allowed reaching a diagnosis. Despite treatment, our patients’ outcome was poor. Study Supported by:

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeurologySame topicChronic Myeloid Leukemia TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207