Flagellin-Dependent and -Independent Inflammatory Responses following Infection by Enteropathogenic<i>Escherichia coli</i>and<i>Citrobacter rodentium</i>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Enteropathogenic Escherichia coli (EPEC) and the murine pathogen Citrobacter rodentium belong to the attaching and effacing (A/E) family of bacterial pathogens. These noninvasive bacteria infect intestinal enterocytes using a type 3 secretion system (T3SS), leading to diarrheal disease and intestinal inflammation. While flagellin, the secreted product of the EPEC fliC gene, causes the release of interleukin 8 (IL-8) from epithelial cells, it is unclear whether A/E bacteria also trigger epithelial inflammatory responses that are FliC independent. The aims of this study were to characterize the FliC dependence or independence of epithelial inflammatory responses to direct infection by EPEC or C. rodentium. Following infection of Caco-2 intestinal epithelial cells by wild-type and DeltafliC EPEC, a rapid activation of several proinflammatory genes, including those encoding IL-8, monocyte chemoattractant protein 1, macrophage inflammatory protein 3alpha (MIP3alpha), and beta-defensin 2, occurred in a FliC-dependent manner. These responses were accompanied by mitogen-activated protein kinase activation, as well as the Toll-like receptor 5 (TLR5)-dependent activation of NF-kappaB. At later infection time points, a subset of these proinflammatory genes (IL-8 and MIP3alpha) was also induced in cells infected with DeltafliC EPEC. The nonmotile A/E pathogen C. rodentium also triggered similar innate responses through a TLR5-independent but partially NF-kappaB-dependent mechanism. Moreover, the EPEC FliC-independent responses were increased in the absence of the locus of enterocyte effacement-encoded T3SS, suggesting that translocated bacterial effectors suppress rather than cause the FliC-independent inflammatory response. Thus, we demonstrate that infection of intestinal epithelial cells by A/E pathogens can trigger an array of proinflammatory responses from epithelial cells through both FliC-dependent and -independent pathways, expanding our understanding of the innate epithelial response to infection by these pathogens.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".