Associations Between Sleep Duration Patterns and Overweight/Obesity at Age 6
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether longitudinal sleep duration patterns during early childhood is a risk factor of overweight or obesity at school entry while controlling for a variety of obesogenic environmental factors. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This is a prospective cohort study (March-December 1998 to December 2004) of a representative sample of infants born in 1997-1998 in the Canadian province of Quebec. Body mass index (BMI) was measured at ages 2.5 and 6 years. Sleep duration was reported yearly from 2.5 to 6 years of age by their mothers. Prenatal, postnatal (5 and 29 months), and lifestyle (6 y) potentially confounding factors for excess weight were assessed by interviews, questionnaires and hospital records. A group-based semiparametric mixture model was used to estimate developmental patterns of sleep duration. The relationship between sleep duration patterns and BMI was tested using multivariate logistic regression models to control for potentially confounding factors on 1138 children. RESULTS: Four sleep duration patterns were identified: short persistent (5.2%), short increasing (4.7%), 10-hour persistent (50.7%), and 11-hour persistent (39.4%). After controlling for potentially confounding factors, the risk for overweight or obesity was almost 4.2 times higher for short persistent sleepers (odds ratio [OR], 4.2; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.6 to 11.1; P = 0.003) than for 11-hour persistent sleepers. CONCLUSIONS: Persistently short sleep duration (<10 h) during early childhood significantly increases the risk of excess weight or obesity in childhood, and appears to be independent of other obesogenic factors.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it