MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2102383360 · doi:10.1144/0016-76492009-077

Re–Os molybdenite dates from the Ballachulish and Kilmelford Igneous Complexes (Scottish Highlands): age constraints for late Caledonian magmatism

2010· article· en· W2102383360 on OpenAlexaff
James Conliffe, David Selby, Sarah J. Porter, Martin Feely

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Geological Society · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMagmatismIgneous rockMolybdeniteGeologyGeochemistryPrecambrianPaleontologyPaleozoicTectonicsQuartz

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract: New Re–Os molybdenite geochronology is presented from the Ballachulish Igneous Complex (433.5 ± 1.8 Ma) and the Kilmelford Igneous Complex (425.8 ± 1.7 Ma) of the SW Scottish Highlands. The sulphide mineralization in the Ballachulish Igneous Complex is related to the latest phase of granite magmatism, and therefore the new Re–Os age provides a minimum crystallization age, c . 3.7 Ma earlier than previous crystallization age estimates. This Re–Os age overlaps U–Pb ages obtained from subduction-related granitic and appinitic magmatism north of the Great Glen Fault, and an origin related to active subduction rather than slab breakoff is proposed for the Ballachulish Igneous Complex. Molybdenite mineralization in the Kilmelford Igneous Complex is spatially and genetically associated with porphyry Cu mineralization, which is consistent with the rapid ascent of volatile-rich magma during early rebound following the breakoff of subducted oceanic lithosphere. The Kilmelford Igneous Complex and the coeval Lorn Lava Pile may represent the earliest of the igneous bodies predicted by slab breakoff, indicating that slab breakoff occurred at c . 426 Ma.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.090
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.200
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations28
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Geological SocietySame topicGeological and Geochemical AnalysisFrench-language works237,207