Controlled Rod Cell Ablation in Transgenic<i>Xenopus laevis</i>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: Because of their high cone/rod ratio, Xenopus laevis may be a useful system for examining rod-cone interactions during retinal degeneration and mechanisms that underlie secondary cone degeneration. The authors developed an inducible model of retinitis pigmentosa (RP) in X. laevis to investigate these issues. METHODS: The authors generated transgenic X. laevis that express a modified caspase-9 (iCasp9) under the control of the X. laevis rod opsin promoter. iCasp9 is activated by the compound AP20187, resulting in an apoptotic cascade. Confocal microscopy, Western blot analysis, and electroretinography (ERG) were used to determine the effects of AP20187 on transgenic retinas. RESULTS: AP20187 induced rod cell apoptosis in transgenic tadpoles and postmetamorphic frogs. Longitudinal results indicate rod cell death led to cone cell dysfunction within 3 months; however, cone function was reinstated after 6 months. Returning cone function may be associated with increased numbers of morphologically normal cone cells and thickening of the inner nuclear layer. CONCLUSIONS: These studies indicate that X. laevis may be a useful system for examining cone dysfunction associated with rod death in RP and longer term regeneration of cone responses. This inducible model of RP is unique in that rod death proceeds through a well-understood mechanism, rod death can be carefully controlled to occur at any stage of development, and the stimulus for rod death can be removed at any time.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".