Critical Oxygen Delivery in Conscious Septic Rats under Stagnant or Anemic Hypoxia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Although evidence shows that critical O2 delivery (QO2crit), the point at which oxygen consumption becomes limited by O2 delivery (QO2), is not affected by the method used to decrease QO2 in healthy subjects, microcirculatory injury caused by sepsis may modify QO2crit in a unique manner. We therefore designed this study to compare QO2crit in anemic and stagnant hypoxia in conscious septic rats. Rats were randomized to control or sepsis induced by cecal ligation and perforation; 24 hours later, oxygen consumption was measured using expired gas analysis, whereas QO2 was calculated from standard formula. Rats were further randomized to anemic hypoxia by isovolemic hemodilution or stagnant hypoxia by stepwise inflation of a balloon-tip catheter in the right atrium. QO2crit and critical hemoglobin concentration were calculated by dual linear regression analysis. We found that (1) QO2crit was not different between anemic and stagnant hypoxia in sepsis and that (2) the critical hemoglobin concentration in anemic hypoxia was similar between sepsis and control, indicating that tolerance to acute anemia is not altered by sepsis. Further studies are needed before the clinical relevance of these conclusions can be fully understood.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".