MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2102495794 · doi:10.1080/00102200903463274

Dynamics of Lean-Premixed Turbulent Combustion at High Turbulence Intensities

2010· article· en· W2102495794 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueCombustion Science and Technology · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicCombustion and flame dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsLaminar flame speedTurbulencePremixed flameMechanicsFlame speedDiffusion flameTurbulence kinetic energyCombustionFlame structureParticle image velocimetryChemistryCombustorLaminar flowBunsen burnerThermodynamicsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Premixed turbulent flames of methane-air stabilized on a Bunsen-type burner were studied to investigate the structure of the flame front at a wide range of turbulence intensities. The nondimensional turbulence rms velocity, rms velocity divided by the laminar flame speed, covered the range from about 3 to 24. The equivalence ratio was varied from 0.6 to stoichiometric. The flame front data were obtained using planar Rayleigh imaging, and particle image velocimetry was used to measure instantaneous velocity field for the experimental conditions studied. Flame front thickness increased slightly with increasing nondimensional turbulence rms velocity. There was no significant difference in flame thickening whether the flame thickness was evaluated at progress variable 0.5, corresponding to the reaction zone, or 0.3, corresponding to the preheat zone. Flame front curvature decreased with increasing turbulence rms velocity. Flame front curvature statistics displayed a Gaussian-like distribution, which centered about zero for all the flame conditions studied during the investigation. Flame surface densities evaluated from flame front images showed almost no dependence on the nondimensional turbulence intensity. Flame surface densities integrated over the flame brush volume also did not show any sensitivity to the nondimensional turbulence rms velocity. This was discussed in the framework of a flame surface density-based turbulent premixed flame propagation closure model. The implication is that the conceptual increase in flame surface density with turbulence may not be the dominant mechanism for flame velocity enhancement in turbulent combustion in the region specified as the flamelet combustion regime by the current turbulent premixed combustion diagrams. Further, the applicability of the flamelet approach may be limited to a much smaller range of conditions than presently believed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.893
Threshold uncertainty score0.669

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it