MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Ability of Wild-Type and Mutant Lysyl-tRNA Synthetase To Facilitate tRNA <sup>Lys</sup> Incorporation into Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1

2004· article· en· W2102506904 on OpenAlexaff
Shan Cen, Hassan Javanbakht, Meijuan Niu, Lawrence Kleiman

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Virology · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicHIV Research and Treatment
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityJewish General Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyTransfer RNAPrimer binding siteMutantTransfectionVirusMolecular biologyRNABiochemistryVirologyGeneticsCell cultureGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The major human tRNA(Lys) isoacceptors, tRNA1,2Lys and tRNA3Lys, are selectively packaged into human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) during assembly, where tRNA3Lys acts as a primer for reverse transcription. Lysyl-tRNA synthetase (LysRS) is also incorporated into HIV-1, independently of tRNA(Lys), via its interaction with Gag, and it is a strong candidate for being the signal that specifically targets tRNA(Lys) for viral incorporation. Expression of exogenous wild-type LysRS in cells results in an approximately twofold increase in the viral packaging of both LysRS and tRNA(Lys). Herein, we show that this increase in tRNA(Lys) incorporation into virions is dependent upon the ability of LysRS to bind to tRNA(Lys) but not upon its ability to aminoacylate the tRNA(Lys). COS7 cells were cotransfected with plasmids coding for both HIV-1 and either wild-type or mutant human LysRS, all of which are incorporated into virions with similar efficiency. However, N-terminally truncated LysRS, which binds poorly to tRNA(Lys), does not increase tRNA(Lys) packaging into viruses, while C-terminally truncated LysRS, which binds to but does not aminoacylate tRNA(Lys), still facilitates an increase in tRNA(Lys) packaging into virions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations56
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of VirologySame topicHIV Research and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207