MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2102558017 · doi:10.5539/jas.v6n12p1

Adjuvants Affect Duckweed (Lemna minor) Control with Pelargonic Acid

2014· article· en· W2102558017 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Charles L. Webber, James W. Shrefler, Merritt J. Taylor

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Agricultural Science · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicBiological Control of Invasive Species
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOrange (colour)Lemna minorLemnaAdjuvantBiologyToxicologyAquatic plantHorticultureChemistryBotanyEcologyMacrophyte

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Duckweeds (Lemna spp.) are small, free floating aquatic plants that flourish on stagnant or slow moving water surfaces throughout the world. Members of the genus are among the smallest flowering plants, providing food for fish and fowl, but their aggressive growth and invasive tendencies make them formidable aquatic weeds, which when uncontrolled can result in oxygen depletion, fish kills, and death of submerged aquatic plants. Pelargonic acid is a fatty acid naturally occurring in many plants and animals, and present in many foods. AXXE® (65% pelargonic acid, BioSafe Systems LLC) is a potential organic herbicide. Research was conducted to determine the impact of spray adjuvants on duckweed control with pelargonic acid. Duckweed was sprayed with 7 pelargonic acid concentrations (0, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10% v/v) combined with 1 of 3 adjuvant treatments [control, BioLink (30% garlic extracts, 10% yucca extracts, and 60% water) at 0.5% v:v, and orange oil (90% d’limonene and 10% inert ingredients) at 0.5% v:v)]. Visual ratings, measuring percentage duckweed control (percentage dead), were collected at 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 and 11 days after treatment (DAT). The experiment was conductive twice using 5 replications. Pelargonic acid phytotoxicity increased as spray concentration increased whether an adjuvant was used or not. The 6% pelargonic acid concentration resulted in 90% or greater duckweed control for all adjuvant treatments (control, BioLink, and Orange Oil) across all evaluation dates (1 – 11 DAT). The addition of either adjuvant applied at the 6% pelargonic acid concentration produced consistently greater duckweed control across all evaluation dates (1 – 11 DAT) compared to the control (no adjuvant). The 8% pelargonic acid rate produced excellent (97% or greater) duckweed control for all adjuvant treatments, with consistently better control with the BioLink adjuvant and typically with the orange oil, compared to the control. At the 10% rate all treatments provided outstanding (99% or greater) control at all evaluation dates, with no significant differences among adjuvant treatments. The research demonstrated the effectiveness of pelargonic acid in controlling duckweed when applied over-the-top. The addition of the BioLink adjuvant often increased the duckweed control compared to the control (no adjuvant). The authors suggest that further research should investigate whether higher rates of these adjuvants or the use other adjuvants would provide satisfactory duckweed control at lower pelargonic acid application rates and the economic implications of the changes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.962
Threshold uncertainty score0.348

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.196
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Agricultural ScienceSame topicBiological Control of Invasive SpeciesFrench-language works237,207