MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2102576414 · doi:10.1094/pdis-04-12-0330-pdn

First Report of <i>Ilyonectria macrodidyma</i> Causing Root Rot of Olive Trees (<i>Olea europaea</i>) in California

2012· article· en· W2102576414 on OpenAlexaff
J. R. Úrbez‐Torres, F. Peduto, W. D. Gubler

Bibliographic record

VenuePlant Disease · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicPlant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases
Canadian institutionsAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyOleaConidiumOlive treesOrange (colour)Potato dextrose agarHorticultureChlamydosporeBotanyRoot rotInoculationAgar

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The California olive industry produces 99% of the U.S. olive crop, which represented a value of over $113 million in 2010. During the 2008 and 2009 growing seasons, decline of young super-high-density olive cvs. Arbequina, Arbosana, and Koroneiki trees (&lt;4 years old) was observed in orchards throughout Glenn, Yolo, and San Joaquin Counties. Symptomatic trees showed stunted growth and chlorotic leaves with roots having black, sunken, necrotic lesions, which frequently prolonged into the base and crown of the tree. Twenty-five trees were collected from different orchards and necrotic roots as well as infected trunk tissue were plated onto potato dextrose agar amended with 0.01% tetracycline hydrochloride. Cultures were incubated at room temperature (23 ± 2°C) until fungal colonies were observed. In 17 out of 25 trees collected (68%), light yellow fungal colonies were observed from the symptomatic tissue after 7 to 10 days. Colonies turned dark yellow to orange with age and showed an orange-dark brown reverse. Both microconidia (hyaline, ellipsoidal to ovoidal and aseptate (n = 60) (6.5) 11.5 to 13.5 (17.1) × (3) 3.4 to 4.5 (5.6) μm) and macroconidia (hyaline, cylindrical, straight and/or slightly curved with one, two or three septa (n = 60) (12.5) 26.5 to 38.5 (44.1) × (4) 5.5 to 7.5 (8.5) μm) were observed. Culture and conidial morphology were in concordance with previous published description of Ilyonectria macrodidyma (Halleen, Schroers &amp; Crous) P. Chaverri &amp; C. Salgado (1,3,4). Identification to species level was confirmed by sequence comparison of four Californian isolates (UCCE958, UCCE959, UCCE960, and UCCE961) with sequences available in GenBank using the internal transcribed spacer region (ITS1-5.8S-ITS2) of the rDNA (primers ITS1/ITS4), a portion of the β-tubulin gene (BT1a/BT1b), and a partial sequence of the mitochondrial small subunit rDNA (NMS1/NMS2) (4). Fungal sequences of isolates from olive from California (GenBank JQ868543 to JQ868554) showed 99 to 100% homology with previously identified and deposited I. macrodidyma isolates in Genbank for all three genes. Pathogenicity of I. macrodidyma in olive cvs. Arbequina, Arbosan, and Koroneiki was investigated using two fungal isolates (UCCE958 and UCCE960) as reported by Petit and Gubler (4). The roots of 10 1-year-old trees per fungal isolate for each olive cultivar were individually inoculated with 25 ml of a 10 6 conidia/ml spore suspension and placed in a lath house at the UC Davis field station. Additionally, 10 trees per cultivar were inoculated with sterile water as controls. Six months after inoculation, most of the inoculated olive plants showed chlorotic leaves similar to those observed in commercial orchards. Root necrosis for each cv. was expressed as the percentage of root length having lesions (2). No significant difference was observed between isolates and average root necrosis was 29.4, 35.6, and 38.3% in Koroniki, Arbosana, and Arbequina, respectiveley. I. macrodidyma was recovered from symptomatic roots in each of the cvs. and identified based on morphology. No root rot symptoms were observed in the controls. To our knowledge, this is the first report of I. macrodidyma causing root rot of olive trees not only in California but anywhere in the world. References: (1) P. Chaverri et al. Stud. Mycol. 68:57, 2011. (2) M. Giovanetti and B. Mosse. New Phytol. 84:489, 1980. (3) F. Halleen et al. Stud. Mycol. 50:421, 2004. (4) E. Petit and W. D. Gubler. Plant Dis. 89:1051, 2005.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.348
Threshold uncertainty score0.704

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations22
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePlant DiseaseSame topicPlant Pathogens and Fungal DiseasesFrench-language works237,207