Functional evidence for Na<sup>+</sup>-activated K<sup>+</sup> channels in circular smooth muscle of the opossum lower esophageal sphincter
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Na(+) reduction induces contraction of opossum lower esophageal sphincter (LES) circular smooth muscle strips in vitro; however, the mechanism(s) by which this occurs is unknown. The purpose of the present study was to investigate the electrophysiological effects of low Na(+) on opossum LES circular smooth muscle. In the presence of atropine, quanethidine, nifedipine, and substance P, conventional intracellular electrodes recorded a resting membrane potential (RMP) of -37.5 +/- 0.9 mV (n = 4). Decreasing [Na(+)] from 144.1 to 26.1 mM by substitution of equimolar NaCl with choline Cl depolarized the RMP by 7.1 +/- 1.1 mV. Whole cell patch-clamp recordings revealed outward K(+) currents that began to activate at -60 mV using 400-ms stepped test pulses (-120 to +100 mV) with increments of 20 mV from holding potential of -80 mV. Reduction of [Na(+)] in the bath solution inhibited K(+) currents in a concentration-dependent manner. Single channels with conductance of 49-60 pS were recorded using cell-attached patch-clamp configurations. The channel open probability was significantly decreased by substitution of bath Na(+) with equimolar choline. A 10-fold increase of [K(+)] in the pipette shifted the reversal potential of the single channels to the positive by -50 mV. These data suggest that Na(+)-activated K(+) channels exist in the circular smooth muscle of the opossum LES.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".